Removal - Revision history

Mr Fox at 23:32, 1 August 2026

2026-08-01T23:32:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 1 August 2026
Line 38:		Line 38:

	Example 2: 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval That means 250 / 1000 = 0.25		Example 2: 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval That means 250 / 1000 = 0.25
	This grade plays a direct role in the impeachment of a member. If 40% of the voters in that election opt to give a grade to an Executive Group member, and if that member receive a grade below 1, then that member has successfully ~~been~~ impeached and is removed from their seat.		This grade plays a direct role in the impeachment of a member. If 40% of the voters in that election opt to give a grade to an ''Executive Group'' member, and if that member receive a grade below 1, then that member has been successfully impeached and removed from their seat.
	Example 3: If there are 5000 total votes cast, with 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval, the percentage of voters giving a grade to this member is 25% [(250 + 1000) / 5000 = 25%]. This is below the 40% threshold, so while the grade remains 0.25, this member would keep their seat.		Example 3: If there are 5000 total votes cast, with 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval, the percentage of voters giving a grade to this member is 25% [(250 + 1000) / 5000 = 25%]. This is below the 40% threshold, so while the grade remains 0.25, this member would keep their seat.

Line 44:		Line 44:

	Example 5: If there are 3000 total votes cast, with 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval, the percentage of voters giving a grade to this member is 41.67% [(250 + 1000) / 3000 = 41.67%]. This is above the 40% threshold, so with a grade of 0.25, this member would be officially impeached and lose their seat.		Example 5: If there are 3000 total votes cast, with 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval, the percentage of voters giving a grade to this member is 41.67% [(250 + 1000) / 3000 = 41.67%]. This is above the 40% threshold, so with a grade of 0.25, this member would be officially impeached and lose their seat.
	This method ~~strikes a good balance and~~ gives the ''Eligible Voters'' the direct ability to remove ineffective or corrupt leaders. But it also shouldn't be easy for a handful of disaffected ''Citizens'' to remove ''Executive Group'' members every ''Election Cycle'' out of spite. This equation ensures our leaders know exactly where they stand with the ''Citizens'' through the periodic grades they receive, and with this knowledge adjust course if necessary. Yet if enough ''Eligible Voters'' have an opinion and give an Executive Group member a bad grade, it results in their removal.		This method gives the ''Eligible Voters'' the direct ability to remove ineffective or corrupt leaders. But it also shouldn't be easy for a handful of disaffected ''Citizens'' to remove ''Executive Group'' members every ''Election Cycle'' out of spite. This equation ensures our leaders know exactly where they stand with the ''Citizens'' through the periodic grades they receive, and with this knowledge adjust course if necessary. Yet if enough ''Eligible Voters'' have an opinion and give an ''Executive Group'' member a bad grade, it results in their immediate removal.

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 23:27, 1 August 2026

2026-08-01T23:27:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 1 August 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	=== '''Path 1: Office Fitness''' ===		=== '''Path 1: Office Fitness''' ===
	Should ~~a potential~~ ''Executive Group'' member's office fitness become a question of mental or physical ability, or an ''Executive Group'' member has not been available for a ''Decision Vote'' for 15 days due to an unexpected unavailability, then the following process is used to remove that member:		Should an ''Executive Group'' member's office fitness become a question of mental or physical ability, or an ''Executive Group'' member has not been available for a ''Decision Vote'' for 15 days due to an unexpected unavailability, then the following process is used to remove that member:

	# The remaining four ''Executive Group'' members must be in unanimous agreement and ''Record'' their vote for this removal.		# The remaining four ''Executive Group'' members must be in unanimous agreement and ''Record'' their vote for this removal (if 15 days have elapsed due to an unexpected unavailability, then the ''Justice Branch'' can move forward without the approval of the ''Executive Group'').
	# The ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will have five days to investigate the situation~~, referring~~ to the expertise of other ''Branches'' or ''Departments'' if needed'','' ~~to first insure this is the appropriate ''Removal Path''.~~ The documentation of this investigation will be deposited into an ''Informed Vote Archive'' for review by the the participants in a ''Global Justice Branch Vote''.		# The ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will have five days to investigate the situation to first insure this is the appropriate ''Removal Path.''
			## Thy may referr to the expertise of other ''Branches'' or ''Departments'' if needed''.''
			## The documentation of this investigation will be deposited into an ''Informed Vote Archive'' for review by the the participants in a ''Global Justice Branch Vote''.
	# The ''Global Justice Branch Vote'' will be held within five days following the deposit into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to determine the appropriateness of the removal of the ''Executive Group'' member using this ''Removal Path''.		# The ''Global Justice Branch Vote'' will be held within five days following the deposit into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to determine the appropriateness of the removal of the ''Executive Group'' member using this ''Removal Path''.
	# With a successful ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' the findings of the investigation will then be made available to the ''Branch Officials'' of all ''Intrinsic and Lateral Branches'' via an ''Informed Vote Archive''.		# With a successful ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' the findings of the investigation will then be made available to the ''Branch Officials'' of all ''Intrinsic and Lateral Branches'' via an ''Informed Vote Archive''.
	# The ''Branch Officials'' of every ''Intrinsic'' and ''Lateral Branch'' will have five days to review the information and then vote using the ''Aggregate Vote'' method.		# The ''Branch Officials'' of every ''Intrinsic'' and ''Lateral Branch'' will have five days to review the information and then vote using the ''Aggregate Vote'' method.
	# A simple majority among the ''Branches'' will results in the removal of the ''Executive Group'' member.		# All ''Branch Officials'' are required to vote, and a simple majority among the ''Branches'' using the ''Aggrege Vote'' method will results in the removal of the ''Executive Group'' member.
	## A tie does not count as a majority.		## A tie does not count as a majority.
	## If there is a failed vote there cannot be another vote on this matter unless there is a substantive change in condition, which the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will be charged with that determination.		## If there is a failed vote there cannot be another vote on this matter unless there is a substantive change in condition, which the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will be charged with that determination.
Line 15:		Line 17:
	=== '''Path 2: Negligence, criminal activity, abuse of position, etc.''' ===		=== '''Path 2: Negligence, criminal activity, abuse of position, etc.''' ===
	# Anyone with knowledge of the abuse of office may refer the matter to the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'', including personnel within the ''Justice Branch''.		# Anyone with knowledge of the abuse of office may refer the matter to the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'', including personnel within the ''Justice Branch''.
	# The ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will investigate the situation in an independent and neutral manner~~, interviewing~~ the indicted ''Executive Member(s)'' and gathering their defense and supporting documentation. The investigators may also refer to the expertise of other ''Branches'' or ''Departments'' if needed. The documentation of this investigation will be deposited into an ''Informed Vote Archive'' for review by the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch.''		# The ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will investigate the situation in an independent and neutral manner
			## They will interview the indicted ''Executive Member(s)'' and gathering their defense and supporting documentation.
			## The investigators may also refer to the expertise of other ''Branches'' or ''Departments'' if needed.
			## The documentation of this investigation will be deposited into an ''Informed Vote Archive'' for review by the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch.''
	# The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will have a vote within 10 days following the deposit of the investigation materials into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to determine if there is a legal basis for the removal. A majority vote in favor will prompt the contents of the investigation in the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to become available for all participants of a ''Global Justice Branch Vote.''		# The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will have a vote within 10 days following the deposit of the investigation materials into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to determine if there is a legal basis for the removal. A majority vote in favor will prompt the contents of the investigation in the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to become available for all participants of a ''Global Justice Branch Vote.''
	# The ''Global Justice Branch Vote'' to decide the fate of the E''xecutive Group'' member(s) will be held no later than 30 days from the majority vote by the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'', and will be based on the investigation materials.		# The ''Global Justice Branch Vote'' to decide the fate of the E''xecutive Group'' member(s) will be held no later than 30 days from the majority vote by the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'', and will be based on the investigation materials.
	# If there is more than one Executive Group member indicted, then each will be individually evaluated and voted upon. A majority vote in favor of removal will result in the immediate loss of seat for that Executive Group member.		# If there is more than one ''Executive Group'' member indicted, then each will be individually evaluated and voted upon. A majority vote in favor of removal will result in the immediate loss of seat for that ''Executive Group'' member.

	=== '''Path 3: Impeachment''' ===		=== '''Path 3: Impeachment''' ===
			Unlike the current messy process in the United States where the voters have no say and instead must hope a couple hundred partisan political elites, half of which belong to the same party as the president, will actually do their job and remove a corrupt president, the following process is used by the Liminal State to change this power dynamic and give the power of impeachment back to the people.

	As it is the ''Eligible Voters'' that are responsible for picking effective leaders, it is entirely up the the ''Eligible Voters'' to judge the performance of the ''Executive Group'', and they have that opportunity every four years with the ''General Election''.		As it is the ''Eligible Voters'' that are responsible for picking effective leaders, it is entirely up the the ''Eligible Voters'' to judge the performance of the ''Executive Group'', and they have that opportunity every four years with the ''General Election''.

	The ''General Election'' is not only used to elect a new member to the ''Executive Group'', but also an opportunity to grade all the existing members on their performance ~~thus far~~, and impeach if necessary. All existing ''Executive Group'' members are graded in this way, including the outgoing senior member.		The ''General Election'' is not only used to elect a new member to the ''Executive Group'', but also an opportunity to grade all the existing members on their performance over the previous four years, and impeach if necessary. All existing ''Executive Group'' members are graded in this way, including the outgoing senior member.

			While it may seem counterintuitive to potentially impeach the outgoing senior ''Executive Group'' member, as there is a year or more prior to the newly elected candidate actual filling the seat it may be in the best interest of the ''Eligible Voters'' to still remove them early. Additionally, this means there is no place for a lame duck official in the Liminal State, and this system encourages all officials to finish the final years in their seats just as actively as their first.

			To calculate the grade that each ''Executive Group'' member receives every four years, divide the the number of votes of disapproval by the number of votes in approval. The greater the result, the better that member's grade.
			Example 1: 1000 votes are in approval and 250 are in disapproval. That means 1000 / 250 = 4

	~~While it may seem counterintuitive~~ to ~~potentially impeach the outgoing senior ''~~Executive Group'' member, ~~there~~ is ~~a year or more prior to the newly elected candidate actual filling the~~ seat, ~~so it may be~~ in the ~~best interest~~ of ~~the ''Eligible Voters''~~ to ~~still remove someone early~~. ~~Additionally~~, ~~this means there is no place for a lame duck official in~~ the ~~Liminal State~~, ~~and~~ this ~~system encourages all officials to finish the final years in~~ their ~~seats just as actively as their first~~.		Example 2: 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval That means 250 / 1000 = 0.25
			This grade plays a direct role in the impeachment of a member. If 40% of the voters in that election opt to give a grade to an Executive Group member, and if that member receive a grade below 1, then that member has successfully been impeached and is removed from their seat.
			Example 3: If there are 5000 total votes cast, with 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval, the percentage of voters giving a grade to this member is 25% [(250 + 1000) / 5000 = 25%]. This is below the 40% threshold, so while the grade remains 0.25, this member would keep their seat.

	To calculate the grade that each ''Executive Group'' member receives every four years, divide the the number of votes against impeachment to the number of votes for. The greater the result, the better that member is doing. If they receive a number less than one, then they lose their seat.		Example 4: If there are 3000 total votes cast, with 1000 votes are in approval and 250 are in disapproval, the percentage of voters giving a grade to this member is 41.67% [(1000 + 250) / 3000 = 41.67%]. This is above the 40% threshold, but with a grade of 4.0, this member would keep their seat.
	Example 1: ~~Out of 5000~~ votes cast, 1000 votes are ~~against impeachment~~ and 250 are ~~for~~. ~~That means~~ 1000 / ~~250~~ = ~~4 (~~the ~~seat~~ of this ~~''Executive Group''~~ member ~~is safe)~~.

	Example 2: ~~Out of 5000~~ votes cast, 250 votes are ~~against impeachment~~ and 1000 are ~~for~~. ~~That means~~ 250 / ~~1000~~ = 0.25 (this ~~''Executive Group~~ member~~'' has lost~~ their seat).		Example 5: If there are 3000 total votes cast, with 250 votes are in approval and 1000 are in disapproval, the percentage of voters giving a grade to this member is 41.67% [(250 + 1000) / 3000 = 41.67%]. This is above the 40% threshold, so with a grade of 0.25, this member would be officially impeached and lose their seat.
	This method ~~is used because~~ it'~~s not good enough to~~ be ~~be okay a a leader in the Liminal State. If~~ a ''Executive Group ~~member~~'' ~~is only getting by and isn~~'~~t actively engaging~~ with the ''Citizens'' and ~~generating good will during their tenure, then they will likely get few people to vote against impeachment~~. ~~That means that even a low number of votes in favor of impeachment can unseat a mediocre~~ ''Executive Group member''.		This method strikes a good balance and gives the ''Eligible Voters'' the direct ability to remove ineffective or corrupt leaders. But it also shouldn't be easy for a handful of disaffected ''Citizens'' to remove ''Executive Group'' members every ''Election Cycle'' out of spite. This equation ensures our leaders know exactly where they stand with the ''Citizens'' through the periodic grades they receive, and with this knowledge adjust course if necessary. Yet if enough ''Eligible Voters'' have an opinion and give an Executive Group member a bad grade, it results in their removal.

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 01:54, 1 August 2026

2026-08-01T01:54:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 1 August 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:
	# If there is more than one Executive Group member indicted, then each will be individually evaluated and voted upon. A majority vote in favor of removal will result in the immediate loss of seat for that Executive Group member.		# If there is more than one Executive Group member indicted, then each will be individually evaluated and voted upon. A majority vote in favor of removal will result in the immediate loss of seat for that Executive Group member.

	=== '''Path 3: ~~No-Confidence Vote~~''' ===		=== '''Path 3: Impeachment''' ===
	It is entirely up the the Eligible Voters to judge the ~~effectiveness~~ of the Executive Group'~~s performance~~, and they have that opportunity with the General Election ~~every four years~~. ~~At that time they~~ not only elect a new member, but ~~they~~ also ~~judge~~ the existing ~~ones~~, including the outgoing senior Executive Group member.		As it is the ''Eligible Voters'' that are responsible for picking effective leaders, it is entirely up the the ''Eligible Voters'' to judge the performance of the ''Executive Group'', and they have that opportunity every four years with the ''General Election''.

			The ''General Election'' is not only used to elect a new member to the ''Executive Group'', but also an opportunity to grade all the existing members on their performance thus far, and impeach if necessary. All existing ''Executive Group'' members are graded in this way, including the outgoing senior member.

			While it may seem counterintuitive to potentially impeach the outgoing senior ''Executive Group'' member, there is a year or more prior to the newly elected candidate actual filling the seat, so it may be in the best interest of the ''Eligible Voters'' to still remove someone early. Additionally, this means there is no place for a lame duck official in the Liminal State, and this system encourages all officials to finish the final years in their seats just as actively as their first.

			To calculate the grade that each ''Executive Group'' member receives every four years, divide the the number of votes against impeachment to the number of votes for. The greater the result, the better that member is doing. If they receive a number less than one, then they lose their seat.
			Example 1: Out of 5000 votes cast, 1000 votes are against impeachment and 250 are for. That means 1000 / 250 = 4 (the seat of this ''Executive Group'' member is safe).

			Example 2: Out of 5000 votes cast, 250 votes are against impeachment and 1000 are for. That means 250 / 1000 = 0.25 (this ''Executive Group member'' has lost their seat).
			This method is used because it's not good enough to be be okay a a leader in the Liminal State. If a ''Executive Group member'' is only getting by and isn't actively engaging with the ''Citizens'' and generating good will during their tenure, then they will likely get few people to vote against impeachment. That means that even a low number of votes in favor of impeachment can unseat a mediocre ''Executive Group member''.

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 01:08, 1 August 2026

2026-08-01T01:08:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 1 August 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:

	=== '''Path 3: No-Confidence Vote''' ===		=== '''Path 3: No-Confidence Vote''' ===
	~~When~~ the ~~leadership of~~ the ~~''Executive Group'' is questioned by~~ the ~~''Branch Officials'', the removal process indicts all members~~ of the Executive Group ~~or none. There is no option to pick and choose in this process for removal.~~		It is entirely up the the Eligible Voters to judge the effectiveness of the Executive Group's performance, and they have that opportunity with the General Election every four years. At that time they not only elect a new member, but they also judge the existing ones, including the outgoing senior Executive Group member.

	~~# With an ''Aggregate Vote'' of one third of all ''Branches'' in favor of calling a ''No-Confidence Vote'~~', ~~the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will provide a neutral investigation. Over the next 180 days~~ they ~~will be tasked~~ with:
	~~## Collecting~~ the ~~''Decision Basis'' of~~ every ~~''Branch Official'' in the vote calling for the ''No-Confidence Vote'', organizing by for or against and redacting the ''Branch'' information and any identifiable information~~ that ~~would indicate the ''Branch Official'' providing the ''Decision Basis''.~~
	~~## Interview and work with all the ''Executive Group'' members independently and compile their defense.~~
	~~## Organize and deposit all investigation information into an ''Informed Vote Archive~~,~~'' available to all ''Eligible Voters''.~~
	~~# While~~ the ~~investigation is ongoing~~, ~~all ''Branches'' will have an emergency ''Branch Primary Election'' to source an eligible new candidate to fill any open seats within~~ the Executive Group.
	~~# Between 180 and 210 days from the deposit of investigation materials into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' there will be a vote by all ''Eligible Voters''.~~
	~~## If the vote passes by 65% or more, then all ''Executive Group'' members are removed~~
	~~## the ''Alternate'' moves into the senior position and assumes the senior term and their ''Special Projects''.~~
	~~## Within 30 days of removal there will be~~

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 00:49, 1 August 2026

2026-08-01T00:49:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 1 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			There are several ''Removal Paths'' available concerning the ''Executive Group''. Each path serves a specific purpose and each situation must use the appropriate path. Each of these removal methods attempts to utilize those who would best understand the situation or have the most ''Standing'' be the effectors of the removal.

			=== '''Path 1: Office Fitness''' ===
	Should a potential ''Executive Group'' member's office fitness become a question of mental or physical ability, or an ''Executive Group'' member has not been available for a ''Decision Vote'' for 15 days due to an unexpected unavailability, then the following process is used to remove that member:		Should a potential ''Executive Group'' member's office fitness become a question of mental or physical ability, or an ''Executive Group'' member has not been available for a ''Decision Vote'' for 15 days due to an unexpected unavailability, then the following process is used to remove that member:

	# The remaining four ''Executive Group'' members must be in unanimous agreement and ''Record'' their vote for this removal.		# The remaining four ''Executive Group'' members must be in unanimous agreement and ''Record'' their vote for this removal.
	# The ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will have five days to investigate the situation, referring to the expertise of other ''Branches'' or ''Departments'' if needed'','' to first insure this is the appropriate ''Removal Path''. The documentation of this investigation will be deposited into an ''Informed Vote Archive'' for review by the the participants in a ''Global Justice Branch Vote''.		# The ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will have five days to investigate the situation, referring to the expertise of other ''Branches'' or ''Departments'' if needed'','' to first insure this is the appropriate ''Removal Path''. The documentation of this investigation will be deposited into an ''Informed Vote Archive'' for review by the the participants in a ''Global Justice Branch Vote''.
	# The ''Global Justice Branch Vote'' will be held within five days of the deposit into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to determine the appropriateness of the removal of the ''Executive Group'' member using this ''Removal Path''.		# The ''Global Justice Branch Vote'' will be held within five days following the deposit into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to determine the appropriateness of the removal of the ''Executive Group'' member using this ''Removal Path''.
	# With a successful ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' the findings of the investigation will then be made available to the ''Branch Officials'' of all ''Intrinsic and Lateral Branches'' via an ''Informed Vote Archive''.		# With a successful ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' the findings of the investigation will then be made available to the ''Branch Officials'' of all ''Intrinsic and Lateral Branches'' via an ''Informed Vote Archive''.
	# The ''Branch Officials'' of every ''Intrinsic'' and ''Lateral Branch'' will have five days to review the information and then vote using the ''Aggregate Vote'' method.		# The ''Branch Officials'' of every ''Intrinsic'' and ''Lateral Branch'' will have five days to review the information and then vote using the ''Aggregate Vote'' method.
Line 10:		Line 13:
	## If there is a failed vote there cannot be another vote on this matter unless there is a substantive change in condition, which the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will be charged with that determination.		## If there is a failed vote there cannot be another vote on this matter unless there is a substantive change in condition, which the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will be charged with that determination.

	~~Should an Executive Group member be suspected of negligence~~, criminal activity, ~~abusing~~ of position, etc., the following is the process for removal:		=== '''Path 2: Negligence, criminal activity, abuse of position, etc.''' ===
			# Anyone with knowledge of the abuse of office may refer the matter to the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'', including personnel within the ''Justice Branch''.
			# The ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will investigate the situation in an independent and neutral manner, interviewing the indicted ''Executive Member(s)'' and gathering their defense and supporting documentation. The investigators may also refer to the expertise of other ''Branches'' or ''Departments'' if needed. The documentation of this investigation will be deposited into an ''Informed Vote Archive'' for review by the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch.''
			# The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will have a vote within 10 days following the deposit of the investigation materials into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to determine if there is a legal basis for the removal. A majority vote in favor will prompt the contents of the investigation in the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to become available for all participants of a ''Global Justice Branch Vote.''
			# The ''Global Justice Branch Vote'' to decide the fate of the E''xecutive Group'' member(s) will be held no later than 30 days from the majority vote by the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'', and will be based on the investigation materials.
			# If there is more than one Executive Group member indicted, then each will be individually evaluated and voted upon. A majority vote in favor of removal will result in the immediate loss of seat for that Executive Group member.

			=== '''Path 3: No-Confidence Vote''' ===
			When the leadership of the ''Executive Group'' is questioned by the ''Branch Officials'', the removal process indicts all members of the Executive Group or none. There is no option to pick and choose in this process for removal.

	# ~~Anyone with knowledge~~ of ~~the abuse~~ of ~~office may refer the matter to~~ the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch''., ~~including personnel within~~ the ''~~Justice~~ Branch''.		# With an ''Aggregate Vote'' of one third of all ''Branches'' in favor of calling a ''No-Confidence Vote'', the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will provide a neutral investigation. Over the next 180 days they will be tasked with:
	# ~~A simple majority vote from~~ the ~~Justice~~ Branch ~~results in the removal of~~ the Executive ~~Member~~.		## Collecting the ''Decision Basis'' of every ''Branch Official'' in the vote calling for the ''No-Confidence Vote'', organizing by for or against and redacting the ''Branch'' information and any identifiable information that would indicate the ''Branch Official'' providing the ''Decision Basis''.
	# If the ~~result~~ of the ~~Justice Branch is~~ a ~~tie~~, then the ~~voting population will decide~~ the ~~issue by majority popular vote~~.		## Interview and work with all the ''Executive Group'' members independently and compile their defense.
			## Organize and deposit all investigation information into an ''Informed Vote Archive,'' available to all ''Eligible Voters''.
			# While the investigation is ongoing, all ''Branches'' will have an emergency ''Branch Primary Election'' to source an eligible new candidate to fill any open seats within the Executive Group.
			# Between 180 and 210 days from the deposit of investigation materials into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' there will be a vote by all ''Eligible Voters''.
			## If the vote passes by 65% or more, then all ''Executive Group'' members are removed
			## the ''Alternate'' moves into the senior position and assumes the senior term and their ''Special Projects''.
			## Within 30 days of removal there will be

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 23:36, 31 July 2026

2026-07-31T23:36:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 31 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should a potential ~~vacancy~~ become a question of mental or physical ability, then the following process is used to remove that member:		Should a potential ''Executive Group'' member's office fitness become a question of mental or physical ability, or an ''Executive Group'' member has not been available for a ''Decision Vote'' for 15 days due to an unexpected unavailability, then the following process is used to remove that member:

	# The remaining four Executive Group ~~Members~~ must be in agreement and vote ~~on the record~~ for this removal.		# The remaining four ''Executive Group'' members must be in unanimous agreement and ''Record'' their vote for this removal.
	# If this ~~vote~~ is ~~unanimous~~, then the ~~three Top~~ Branch ~~Members~~ of every Intrinsic and Lateral ~~branch~~ will vote ~~next. Each branch~~'~~s aggregate vote contributes one vote to the final tally~~.		# The ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will have five days to investigate the situation, referring to the expertise of other ''Branches'' or ''Departments'' if needed'','' to first insure this is the appropriate ''Removal Path''. The documentation of this investigation will be deposited into an ''Informed Vote Archive'' for review by the the participants in a ''Global Justice Branch Vote''.
	# A simple majority ~~of all branch votes in affirmative~~ results in the removal of the Executive Group member. A tie does not count~~, and with~~ a failed vote there cannot be another vote on this ~~action~~ unless there is a substantive change in condition, which the Justice Branch will be charged with ~~determining~~.		# The ''Global Justice Branch Vote'' will be held within five days of the deposit into the ''Informed Vote Archive'' to determine the appropriateness of the removal of the ''Executive Group'' member using this ''Removal Path''.
			# With a successful ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' the findings of the investigation will then be made available to the ''Branch Officials'' of all ''Intrinsic and Lateral Branches'' via an ''Informed Vote Archive''.
			# The ''Branch Officials'' of every ''Intrinsic'' and ''Lateral Branch'' will have five days to review the information and then vote using the ''Aggregate Vote'' method.
			# A simple majority among the ''Branches'' will results in the removal of the ''Executive Group'' member.
			## A tie does not count as a majority.
			## If there is a failed vote there cannot be another vote on this matter unless there is a substantive change in condition, which the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch'' will be charged with that determination.

	Should an ~~executive group~~ member be suspected of negligence, criminal activity, abusing of position, etc., the following is the process for removal:		Should an Executive Group member be suspected of negligence, criminal activity, abusing of position, etc., the following is the process for removal:

	# ~~The four other members must vote,~~ with ~~a majority vote resulting in a referral~~ to the Justice Branch. ~~The~~ Justice Branch ~~may also initiate a vote on their own without a referral by the Executive Group~~.		# Anyone with knowledge of the abuse of office may refer the matter to the ''Enforcement Agency'' of the ''Justice Branch''., including personnel within the ''Justice Branch''.
	# A simple majority vote from the Justice Branch results in the removal of the Executive Member.		# A simple majority vote from the Justice Branch results in the removal of the Executive Member.
	# If the result of the Justice Branch is a tie, then the voting population will decide the issue by majority popular vote.		# If the result of the Justice Branch is a tie, then the voting population will decide the issue by majority popular vote.

Mr Fox at 19:10, 31 July 2026

2026-07-31T19:10:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 31 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~''Executive Group'' members are required to finish their terms if mentally and physically possible, as any candidate will know. But should someone die,~~ become ~~mentally incapacitated~~, ~~or for any other valid reason vacate their seat through one of~~ the ~~available ''Removal Paths'', there~~ is ~~a procedure in place~~ to ~~refill~~ that ~~seat.~~		Should a potential vacancy become a question of mental or physical ability, then the following process is used to remove that member:

	At the ~~conclusion of the most recent ''General Election''~~, the ~~runner up~~ will ~~become the ''Alternate'~~' to the ~~''Executive Group''~~. ~~This person will be available for~~ all ~~meetings,~~ votes~~, and interactions~~ of the ~~five ''~~Executive Group~~'' members so~~ this ~~''Alternate''~~ is, ~~at all times, current on all aspects of~~ the ~~nation~~.		# The remaining four Executive Group Members must be in agreement and vote on the record for this removal.
			# If this vote is unanimous, then the three Top Branch Members of every Intrinsic and Lateral branch will vote next. Each branch's aggregate vote contributes one vote to the final tally.
			# A simple majority of all branch votes in affirmative results in the removal of the Executive Group member. A tie does not count, and with a failed vote there cannot be another vote on this action unless there is a substantive change in condition, which the Justice Branch will be charged with determining.

	~~They will also become familiar with the ''Special Projects''~~ of ~~every current ''Executive Group'' member and may even help them~~, ~~and in this way be able to step in should an ''Executive Member'' vacate their seat~~.		Should an executive group member be suspected of negligence, criminal activity, abusing of position, etc., the following is the process for removal:

	~~This ''Alternate''~~ may ~~work~~ on ~~abbreviated versions of~~ their own ~~''Special Projects'' so long as they are completed within~~ the ~~five years before the next ''General Election'', should they not be needed to fulfill the role of ''~~Executive Group~~'' member~~. ~~At no time as ''Alternate'' should they ever do any work specifically reserved for the ''Executive Group''.~~		# The four other members must vote, with a majority vote resulting in a referral to the Justice Branch. The Justice Branch may also initiate a vote on their own without a referral by the Executive Group.
			# A simple majority vote from the Justice Branch results in the removal of the Executive Member.
	~~If the~~ A~~''lternate'' is needed to fulfill~~ the ~~role of an ''Executive Group'' member, they will take over the existing executive’s term and ''Special Projects'', but will be considered~~ the ~~junior member~~ of the ~~group~~. ~~The ''Special Projects'' of the Alternate will be secondary to~~ the ~~''Special Projects''~~ of the ~~executive role they are fulfilling.~~		# If the result of the Justice Branch is a tie, then the voting population will decide the issue by majority popular vote.

	~~At the point that the ''Alternate'' fills~~ a seat in the ''Executive Group'', the next runner up from the last ''General Election'' will immediately step into the role of ''Alternate''. Should more than one seat be vacated due to ''Citizen'' impeachment, then ~~this same process will be used to fill all open seats, with each new runner up filling~~ the ~~next seat of most seniority according to election placement, and where those new members~~ will ~~take on~~ the terms and seniority of the seat they are filling. When filling multiple seats in this way, these runner up candidates will abandon the ''Special Projects'' they ran on and instead complete the ''Special Projects'' already started by ~~the seat they are filling~~.

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 19:07, 31 July 2026

2026-07-31T19:07:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 31 July 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	This ''Alternate'' may work on abbreviated versions of their own ''Special Projects'' so long as they are completed within the five years before the next ''General Election'', should they not be needed to fulfill the role of ''Executive Group'' member. At no time as ''Alternate'' should they ever do any work specifically reserved for the ''Executive Group''.		This ''Alternate'' may work on abbreviated versions of their own ''Special Projects'' so long as they are completed within the five years before the next ''General Election'', should they not be needed to fulfill the role of ''Executive Group'' member. At no time as ''Alternate'' should they ever do any work specifically reserved for the ''Executive Group''.

	If the ~~Alternate~~ is needed to fulfill the role of an Executive Group member, they will take over the existing executive’s term and ''Special Projects'', but will be considered the junior member of the group. The ''Special Projects'' of the Alternate will be secondary to the ''Special Projects'' of the executive role they are fulfilling.		If the A''lternate'' is needed to fulfill the role of an ''Executive Group'' member, they will take over the existing executive’s term and ''Special Projects'', but will be considered the junior member of the group. The ''Special Projects'' of the Alternate will be secondary to the ''Special Projects'' of the executive role they are fulfilling.

	At the point that the ''Alternate'' fills a seat in the ''Executive Group'', the next runner up from the last ''General Election'' will immediately step into the role of ''Alternate''. Should more than one seat be vacated due to ''Citizen'' impeachment, then this same process will be used to fill all open seats, with each new runner up filling the next seat of most seniority according to election placement, and where those new members will take on the terms and seniority of the seat they are filling. When filling multiple seats in this way, these runner up candidates will abandon the ''Special Projects'' they ran on and instead complete the ''Special Projects'' already started by the seat they are filling.		At the point that the ''Alternate'' fills a seat in the ''Executive Group'', the next runner up from the last ''General Election'' will immediately step into the role of ''Alternate''. Should more than one seat be vacated due to ''Citizen'' impeachment, then this same process will be used to fill all open seats, with each new runner up filling the next seat of most seniority according to election placement, and where those new members will take on the terms and seniority of the seat they are filling. When filling multiple seats in this way, these runner up candidates will abandon the ''Special Projects'' they ran on and instead complete the ''Special Projects'' already started by the seat they are filling.

Mr Fox: Created page with "''Executive Group'' members are required to finish their terms if mentally and physically possible, as any candidate will know. But should someone die, become mentally incapacitated, or for any other valid reason vacate their seat through one of the available ''Removal Paths'', there is a procedure in place to refill that seat. At the conclusion of the most recent ''General Election'', the runner up will become the ''Alternate'' to the ''Executive Group''. This person w..."

2026-07-31T18:52:34Z

Created page with "''Executive Group'' members are required to finish their terms if mentally and physically possible, as any candidate will know. But should someone die, become mentally incapacitated, or for any other valid reason vacate their seat through one of the available ''Removal Paths'', there is a procedure in place to refill that seat. At the conclusion of the most recent ''General Election'', the runner up will become the ''Alternate'' to the ''Executive Group''. This person w..."

New page

''Executive Group'' members are required to finish their terms if mentally and physically possible, as any candidate will know. But should someone die, become mentally incapacitated, or for any other valid reason vacate their seat through one of the available ''Removal Paths'', there is a procedure in place to refill that seat.

At the conclusion of the most recent ''General Election'', the runner up will become the ''Alternate'' to the ''Executive Group''. This person will be available for all meetings, votes, and interactions of the five ''Executive Group'' members so this ''Alternate'' is, at all times, current on all aspects of the nation.

They will also become familiar with the ''Special Projects'' of every current ''Executive Group'' member and may even help them, and in this way be able to step in should an ''Executive Member'' vacate their seat.

This ''Alternate'' may work on abbreviated versions of their own ''Special Projects'' so long as they are completed within the five years before the next ''General Election'', should they not be needed to fulfill the role of ''Executive Group'' member. At no time as ''Alternate'' should they ever do any work specifically reserved for the ''Executive Group''.

If the Alternate is needed to fulfill the role of an Executive Group member, they will take over the existing executive’s term and ''Special Projects'', but will be considered the junior member of the group. The ''Special Projects'' of the Alternate will be secondary to the ''Special Projects'' of the executive role they are fulfilling.

At the point that the ''Alternate'' fills a seat in the ''Executive Group'', the next runner up from the last ''General Election'' will immediately step into the role of ''Alternate''. Should more than one seat be vacated due to ''Citizen'' impeachment, then this same process will be used to fill all open seats, with each new runner up filling the next seat of most seniority according to election placement, and where those new members will take on the terms and seniority of the seat they are filling. When filling multiple seats in this way, these runner up candidates will abandon the ''Special Projects'' they ran on and instead complete the ''Special Projects'' already started by the seat they are filling.

=== '''Site Navigation''' ===
''Continue Reading:''

[[Rational|← Rational]] | [[Removal]] | [[Replacement|Replacement →]]

''Site Map:''

[[Category:Executive Group]]
<categorytree mode="pages" hideroot="on" depth="5">Core</categorytree>