Intrinsic Branch: Justice - Revision history

Mr Fox at 00:04, 17 August 2026

2026-08-17T00:04:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 17 August 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Just like all ''Branches'', typical ''Justice Branch'' management is handled by the ''Branch Officials''. For the most important questions, such as whether to remove an official from their position or the determination of legality of decisions, regulations, and laws in their final form (and prior to a deciding vote), decisions are made using ''Justice Branch Screenings. A Justice Branch Screening'' utilizes a ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' where the decision concerning lawfulness is decided by a majority vote among all ''Leadership Groups'' within the ''Justice Branch''. In this way there is a large pool of qualified and highly knowledgeable legal experts weighing in on the most important decisions, crossing generational divides and political perspectives and limiting the effects of politics and personal preferences in those outcomes.		Just like all ''Branches'', typical ''Justice Branch'' management is handled by the ''Branch Officials''. For the most important questions, such as whether to remove an official from their position or the determination of legality of decisions, regulations, and laws in their final form (and prior to a deciding vote), decisions are made using ''Justice Branch Screenings. A Justice Branch Screening'' utilizes a ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' where the decision concerning lawfulness is decided by a majority vote among all ''Leadership Groups'' within the ''Justice Branch''. In this way there is a large pool of qualified and highly knowledgeable legal experts weighing in on the most important decisions, crossing generational divides and political perspectives and limiting the effects of politics and personal preferences in those outcomes.

	The ''Justice Branch'' also provides advice at every step of the decision making process, up until a ''Justice Branch Screening'' is needed, which prevents wasted energy on what might be an unlawful implementation. The initial review for legality of potential decisions, regulations, and laws (prior to their final form ~~when~~ a ''Justice Branch Screening'' is required) is decided using the ''Justice Delegate Vote Method''.		The ''Justice Branch'' also provides advice at every step of the decision making process, up until a ''Justice Branch Screening'' is needed, which prevents wasted energy on what might be an otherwise unlawful implementation. The initial review for legality of potential decisions, regulations, and laws (prior to their final form, at which a ''Justice Branch Screening'' is required) is decided using the ''Justice Delegate Vote Method''.

	With the work of the ''Justice Branch'', there is never a question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect, nor any ~~reason~~ to retroactively reinterpret or deny enforcement ~~without~~ a new vote. This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are passed and then fought over, where ~~whimsical~~ courts and a handful of partisan judges ~~may have~~ different perspectives and agendas ~~that~~ affect how laws are interpreted or enforced, regardless of initial intent or citizens wishes.		With the work of the ''Justice Branch'', there is never a question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect, nor any excuse to retroactively reinterpret or deny enforcement outside of a new vote. This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are passed and then fought over; where courts have the power to overturn any decision and a handful of partisan judges with different perspectives and agendas can affect how laws are interpreted or enforced, regardless of initial intent or citizens wishes.

	While the ''Justice Branch'' is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' have the right to assign these cases to ''Independent Departments''. In the case of any issues within the ''Justice Branch'', they are obligated to appoint independent outside ~~council~~ to investigate.		While the ''Justice Branch'' is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' have the right to assign these cases to ''Independent Departments''. In the case of any issues within the ''Justice Branch'', they are obligated to appoint independent outside investigators to investigate.

	Depending on the implementation of the Liminal State, the ''Judicial Branch'' may be charged with handling the prisons. If this is the case, it should not fall under the preview of the ''Enforcement Agency''. A better alternative would be to have prison management fall under the ''Lateral Branch'' between the ''Justice Branch'' and the ''Health Branch'', to ensure that inmate and societal welfare is maximized.		Depending on the implementation of the Liminal State, the ''Judicial Branch'' may be charged with handling the prisons. If this is the case, it should not fall under the preview of the ''Enforcement Agency''. A better alternative would be to have prison management fall under the ''Lateral Branch'' between the ''Justice Branch'' and the ''Health Branch'', to ensure that inmate and societal welfare is maximized.

Mr Fox at 20:23, 14 August 2026

2026-08-14T20:23:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 14 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The ''Justice Branch'' operates with complete independence from the ''Executive Group'', answering only to the foundational laws ~~and rules~~ of the Liminal State. It makes decisions on the ~~lawfulness~~ of all ~~rules~~ and decisions facing the ''Executive Group'' ~~and~~ ''Branches'', or concerning ''Citizens Initiatives;'' always prior to them being voted on and and going into effect.		The ''Justice Branch'' operates with complete independence from the ''Executive Group'', answering only to the foundational laws of the Liminal State. It makes decisions on the legality of all laws and decisions facing the ''Executive Group'' or ''Branches'', and concerning ''Citizens Initiatives;'' always prior to them being voted on and and going into effect.

	Just like all ''Branches'', typical ''Justice Branch'' management is handled by the ''Branch Officials''. For the most important questions, such as whether to remove an official from their position or the determination of ~~lawfulness~~ of decisions, regulations, and laws in their final form (and prior to a deciding vote), decisions are made using ''Justice Branch Screenings. A Justice Branch Screening'' utilizes a ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' where the decision concerning lawfulness is decided by a majority vote among all ''Leadership Groups'' within the ''Justice Branch''. In this way there is a large pool of qualified and highly knowledgeable legal experts weighing in on the most important decisions, crossing generational divides and political perspectives and limiting the effects of politics and personal preferences in those outcomes.		Just like all ''Branches'', typical ''Justice Branch'' management is handled by the ''Branch Officials''. For the most important questions, such as whether to remove an official from their position or the determination of legality of decisions, regulations, and laws in their final form (and prior to a deciding vote), decisions are made using ''Justice Branch Screenings. A Justice Branch Screening'' utilizes a ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' where the decision concerning lawfulness is decided by a majority vote among all ''Leadership Groups'' within the ''Justice Branch''. In this way there is a large pool of qualified and highly knowledgeable legal experts weighing in on the most important decisions, crossing generational divides and political perspectives and limiting the effects of politics and personal preferences in those outcomes.

	The ''Justice Branch'' also provides advice at every step of the decision making process up until a ''Justice Branch Screening'' is needed, which prevents wasted energy on what might be an unlawful implementation. The initial review for ~~lawfulness~~ of potential decisions, regulations, and laws (prior to their final form) is decided using the ''Justice Delegate Vote Method''.		The ''Justice Branch'' also provides advice at every step of the decision making process, up until a ''Justice Branch Screening'' is needed, which prevents wasted energy on what might be an unlawful implementation. The initial review for legality of potential decisions, regulations, and laws (prior to their final form when a ''Justice Branch Screening'' is required) is decided using the ''Justice Delegate Vote Method''.

	With the work of the ''Justice Branch'', there is never a question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect, nor any reason to retroactively reinterpret or deny enforcement without a new vote. This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are passed and then fought over, where whimsical courts and partisan judges may have different perspectives and agendas that affect how laws are interpreted or enforced, regardless of initial intent or citizens wishes.		With the work of the ''Justice Branch'', there is never a question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect, nor any reason to retroactively reinterpret or deny enforcement without a new vote. This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are passed and then fought over, where whimsical courts and a handful of partisan judges may have different perspectives and agendas that affect how laws are interpreted or enforced, regardless of initial intent or citizens wishes.

	While the ''Justice Branch'' is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' have the right to assign these cases to ''Independent Departments''. In the case of any issues within the ''Justice Branch'', they are obligated to appoint independent outside council to investigate.		While the ''Justice Branch'' is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' have the right to assign these cases to ''Independent Departments''. In the case of any issues within the ''Justice Branch'', they are obligated to appoint independent outside council to investigate.

	Depending on the implementation of the Liminal State, the ''Judicial Branch'' may be charged with handling the prisons. If this is the case, it should not fall under preview of the ''Enforcement Agency''. A better alternative would be to have prison management fall under the ''Lateral Branch'' between the ''Justice Branch'' and the ''Health Branch'', to ensure that welfare is maximized.		Depending on the implementation of the Liminal State, the ''Judicial Branch'' may be charged with handling the prisons. If this is the case, it should not fall under the preview of the ''Enforcement Agency''. A better alternative would be to have prison management fall under the ''Lateral Branch'' between the ''Justice Branch'' and the ''Health Branch'', to ensure that inmate and societal welfare is maximized.

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 18:06, 14 August 2026

2026-08-14T18:06:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 14 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The ''Justice Branch'' operates with complete independence from the ''Executive Group'', answering only to the foundational laws and rules of the Liminal State. It makes decisions on the lawfulness of all rules and decisions facing the ''Executive Group'' and ''Branches'', or concerning ''Citizens Initiatives; ~~always~~'' prior to them being voted on and and going into effect. This ''Branch'' does this at all levels of the Liminal State, and provides advice at every step of the decision making process to prevent unlawful implementation. With the work of the Justice Branch, there is never a question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect, nor any reason to retroactively deny interpretation or enforcement without a new vote.		The ''Justice Branch'' operates with complete independence from the ''Executive Group'', answering only to the foundational laws and rules of the Liminal State. It makes decisions on the lawfulness of all rules and decisions facing the ''Executive Group'' and ''Branches'', or concerning ''Citizens Initiatives;'' always prior to them being voted on and and going into effect.

	~~This~~ is the ~~inverse~~ of ~~the United States~~, ~~where~~ laws are ~~passed~~ and ~~then fought over~~, ~~where whimsical courts~~ and ~~partisan judges may have different~~ perspectives and ~~agendas that affect how laws are interpreted or enforced, regardless~~ of ~~initial intent or citizen wishes~~.		Just like all ''Branches'', typical ''Justice Branch'' management is handled by the ''Branch Officials''. For the most important questions, such as whether to remove an official from their position or the determination of lawfulness of decisions, regulations, and laws in their final form (and prior to a deciding vote), decisions are made using ''Justice Branch Screenings. A Justice Branch Screening'' utilizes a ''Global Justice Branch Vote,'' where the decision concerning lawfulness is decided by a majority vote among all ''Leadership Groups'' within the ''Justice Branch''. In this way there is a large pool of qualified and highly knowledgeable legal experts weighing in on the most important decisions, crossing generational divides and political perspectives and limiting the effects of politics and personal preferences in those outcomes.

	~~While many of the important decisions facing a typical ''Branch'' are decided by the ''Branch Officials'' or in concert with ''Delegate Teams'' in regards to ''Lateral Branches'', the~~ ''Justice Branch'' ~~operates very different on those decisions before them regarding~~ the ~~law, which are called ''Justice Branch Screenings''. Typical~~ ''Justice Branch'' ~~management~~ is ~~handled entirely by the ''Branch Officials'', but in regards to ''Justice Branch Screenings''~~, which ~~can include but is not limited to the question to remove~~ an ~~official from their position, or the~~ review of potential ~~laws~~, regulations, ~~or decisions, the vote~~ is ~~not limited to the ''Branch Officials'' of~~ the ''Justice ~~Branch''. In these cases all Eligible Voters that have passed the Empathy Test and been with the Branch for 5 years or more with the~~ ''~~Justice Branch'' vote. In this way there is a large pool of qualified voters, crossing generational divides and political perspectives~~.		The ''Justice Branch'' also provides advice at every step of the decision making process up until a ''Justice Branch Screening'' is needed, which prevents wasted energy on what might be an unlawful implementation. The initial review for lawfulness of potential decisions, regulations, and laws (prior to their final form) is decided using the ''Justice Delegate Vote Method''.

	~~While~~ the ~~''Justice Branch'' is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The ''Branch Officials''~~ of the ''Justice Branch'' ~~have~~ the ~~right to assign these cases~~ to ~~Independent Departments~~. In the ~~case~~ of ~~any issues within~~ the ~~Justice Branch~~, ~~they~~ are ~~obligated to appoint independent outside council to investigate them~~.		With the work of the ''Justice Branch'', there is never a question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect, nor any reason to retroactively reinterpret or deny enforcement without a new vote. This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are passed and then fought over, where whimsical courts and partisan judges may have different perspectives and agendas that affect how laws are interpreted or enforced, regardless of initial intent or citizens wishes.

	The Branch Officials of the Justice Branch ~~are voted into their positions~~ the ~~same way all Branch Officials are, and they are then responsible for staffing positions and making day~~ to ~~day decisions for~~ the ''Branch''.		While the ''Justice Branch'' is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' have the right to assign these cases to ''Independent Departments''. In the case of any issues within the ''Justice Branch'', they are obligated to appoint independent outside council to investigate.

	~~The law enforcement department for~~ the Judicial Branch is ~~special in that they are also responsible for managing~~ the ~~relationship~~ between the ~~law violators~~ and the ~~branch~~ that ~~ultimately handles prisons~~. ~~(who is? - make sure to include in that branch profile)~~		Depending on the implementation of the Liminal State, the ''Judicial Branch'' may be charged with handling the prisons. If this is the case, it should not fall under preview of the ''Enforcement Agency''. A better alternative would be to have prison management fall under the ''Lateral Branch'' between the ''Justice Branch'' and the ''Health Branch'', to ensure that welfare is maximized.

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 01:39, 14 August 2026

2026-08-14T01:39:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 14 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The ~~Judiciary~~ Branch operates ~~completely independent of~~ the ''Executive Group'', answering only to the foundational laws and rules of the Liminal State~~, and~~ makes decisions on the lawfulness of ~~any~~ rules and decisions of the ''Executive Group'', ''Branches'', or ''Citizens Initiatives'' prior to them being voted on and ~~potentially~~ going into effect. ~~They do~~ this at all levels of the Liminal State, and ~~they provide~~ advice at every step of the decision making process ~~and a prior to any final decisions~~ to prevent unlawful implementation, so there is no question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect.		The ''Justice Branch'' operates with complete independence from the ''Executive Group'', answering only to the foundational laws and rules of the Liminal State. It makes decisions on the lawfulness of all rules and decisions facing the ''Executive Group'' and ''Branches'', or concerning ''Citizens Initiatives; always'' prior to them being voted on and and going into effect. This ''Branch'' does this at all levels of the Liminal State, and provides advice at every step of the decision making process to prevent unlawful implementation. With the work of the Justice Branch, there is never a question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect, nor any reason to retroactively deny interpretation or enforcement without a new vote.

	This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are fought over ~~after voting and implementation~~, where whimsical courts and partisan judges may have different perspectives and agendas that affect ~~these~~ laws ~~and the will~~ of ~~the people~~.		This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are passed and then fought over, where whimsical courts and partisan judges may have different perspectives and agendas that affect how laws are interpreted or enforced, regardless of initial intent or citizen wishes.

	While many of the important decisions facing a typical ''Branch'' are decided by the ''Branch Officials'' or in concert with ''Delegate Teams'' in regards to ''Lateral Branches'', the ''Justice Branch'' operates very different on those decisions before them regarding the law, which are called ''Justice Branch Screenings''. Typical ''Justice Branch'' management is handled entirely by the ''Branch Officials'', but in regards to ''Justice Branch Screenings'', which can include but is not limited to the question to remove an official from their position, or the review of potential laws, regulations, or decisions, the vote is not limited to the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch''. In these cases all Eligible Voters that have passed the Empathy Test and been with the Branch for 5 years or more with the ''Justice Branch'' vote. In this way there is a large pool of qualified voters, crossing generational divides and political perspectives.		While many of the important decisions facing a typical ''Branch'' are decided by the ''Branch Officials'' or in concert with ''Delegate Teams'' in regards to ''Lateral Branches'', the ''Justice Branch'' operates very different on those decisions before them regarding the law, which are called ''Justice Branch Screenings''. Typical ''Justice Branch'' management is handled entirely by the ''Branch Officials'', but in regards to ''Justice Branch Screenings'', which can include but is not limited to the question to remove an official from their position, or the review of potential laws, regulations, or decisions, the vote is not limited to the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch''. In these cases all Eligible Voters that have passed the Empathy Test and been with the Branch for 5 years or more with the ''Justice Branch'' vote. In this way there is a large pool of qualified voters, crossing generational divides and political perspectives.

Mr Fox at 17:53, 13 August 2026

2026-08-13T17:53:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 13 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Judiciary Branch operates completely independent of the Executive Group, answering only to the foundational laws and rules of the Liminal State, and makes decisions on the lawfulness of any rules and decisions of the Executive Group or ~~branches~~ prior to them being voted on and potentially going into effect. They do this at all levels of the Liminal State, and they provide advice at every step of the decision making process and a prior to any final ~~decision~~ to prevent unlawful implementation, so there is no question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect.		The Judiciary Branch operates completely independent of the ''Executive Group'', answering only to the foundational laws and rules of the Liminal State, and makes decisions on the lawfulness of any rules and decisions of the ''Executive Group'', ''Branches'', or ''Citizens Initiatives'' prior to them being voted on and potentially going into effect. They do this at all levels of the Liminal State, and they provide advice at every step of the decision making process and a prior to any final decisions to prevent unlawful implementation, so there is no question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect.

	This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are fought over after voting and implementation, where whimsical courts and partisan judges may have different perspectives and agendas that affect these laws.		This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are fought over after voting and implementation, where whimsical courts and partisan judges may have different perspectives and agendas that affect these laws and the will of the people.

	While many of the important decisions facing a typical ~~branch~~ are decided by the ~~three Top~~ Branch Officials or in concert with ~~Branch Delegates when regarding~~ Lateral Branches, the Justice Branch operates very different. ~~When a review of~~ the ~~lawfulness of a decision or~~ the question to remove an official from their position, or the review of potential laws, regulations, or decisions, the vote is not limited to the ~~Top~~ Branch Officials. In these cases all ~~eligible voting personnel~~ with 5 years or more with the Justice Branch vote. In this way there is a large pool of qualified voters, crossing generational divides and political perspectives.		While many of the important decisions facing a typical ''Branch'' are decided by the ''Branch Officials'' or in concert with ''Delegate Teams'' in regards to ''Lateral Branches'', the ''Justice Branch'' operates very different on those decisions before them regarding the law, which are called ''Justice Branch Screenings''. Typical ''Justice Branch'' management is handled entirely by the ''Branch Officials'', but in regards to ''Justice Branch Screenings'', which can include but is not limited to the question to remove an official from their position, or the review of potential laws, regulations, or decisions, the vote is not limited to the ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch''. In these cases all Eligible Voters that have passed the Empathy Test and been with the Branch for 5 years or more with the ''Justice Branch'' vote. In this way there is a large pool of qualified voters, crossing generational divides and political perspectives.

	While the Justice Branch is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The ~~Top~~ Branch Officials of the Justice Branch have the right to assign these cases to ~~independent departments~~. In the case of any issues within the Justice Branch, they are obligated to appoint independent outside council to investigate them.		While the ''Justice Branch'' is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The ''Branch Officials'' of the ''Justice Branch'' have the right to assign these cases to Independent Departments. In the case of any issues within the Justice Branch, they are obligated to appoint independent outside council to investigate them.

	The ~~Top~~ Branch Officials of the Justice Branch are voted into their positions the same way all ~~Top~~ Branch Officials are, and they are then responsible for staffing positions and making day to day decisions for the ~~branch~~.		The Branch Officials of the Justice Branch are voted into their positions the same way all Branch Officials are, and they are then responsible for staffing positions and making day to day decisions for the ''Branch''.

	The law enforcement department for the Judicial Branch is special in that they are also responsible for managing the relationship between the law violators and the branch that ultimately handles prisons. (who is? - make sure to include in that branch profile)		The law enforcement department for the Judicial Branch is special in that they are also responsible for managing the relationship between the law violators and the branch that ultimately handles prisons. (who is? - make sure to include in that branch profile)

Mr Fox at 03:49, 25 July 2026

2026-07-25T03:49:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 25 July 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The Top Branch Officials of the Justice Branch are voted into their positions the same way all Top Branch Officials are, and they are then responsible for staffing positions and making day to day decisions for the branch.		The Top Branch Officials of the Justice Branch are voted into their positions the same way all Top Branch Officials are, and they are then responsible for staffing positions and making day to day decisions for the branch.

			The law enforcement department for the Judicial Branch is special in that they are also responsible for managing the relationship between the law violators and the branch that ultimately handles prisons. (who is? - make sure to include in that branch profile)

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox at 03:45, 25 July 2026

2026-07-25T03:45:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 25 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Justice		The Judiciary Branch operates completely independent of the Executive Group, answering only to the foundational laws and rules of the Liminal State, and makes decisions on the lawfulness of any rules and decisions of the Executive Group or branches prior to them being voted on and potentially going into effect. They do this at all levels of the Liminal State, and they provide advice at every step of the decision making process and a prior to any final decision to prevent unlawful implementation, so there is no question about the validity of a decision or process taking effect.

			This is the inverse of the United States, where laws are fought over after voting and implementation, where whimsical courts and partisan judges may have different perspectives and agendas that affect these laws.

			While many of the important decisions facing a typical branch are decided by the three Top Branch Officials or in concert with Branch Delegates when regarding Lateral Branches, the Justice Branch operates very different. When a review of the lawfulness of a decision or the question to remove an official from their position, or the review of potential laws, regulations, or decisions, the vote is not limited to the Top Branch Officials. In these cases all eligible voting personnel with 5 years or more with the Justice Branch vote. In this way there is a large pool of qualified voters, crossing generational divides and political perspectives.

			While the Justice Branch is responsible for investigating all government abuses, The Top Branch Officials of the Justice Branch have the right to assign these cases to independent departments. In the case of any issues within the Justice Branch, they are obligated to appoint independent outside council to investigate them.

			The Top Branch Officials of the Justice Branch are voted into their positions the same way all Top Branch Officials are, and they are then responsible for staffing positions and making day to day decisions for the branch.

	=== '''Site Navigation''' ===		=== '''Site Navigation''' ===

Mr Fox: Created page with "Justice === '''Site Navigation''' === ''Continue Reading:'' ← Intrinsic Branch: International Affairs | Intrinsic Branch: Justice | Intrinsic Branch: Progress → ← Intrinsic Branches ''Site Map:'' Category:Intrinsic Branch Intrinsic Branch"

2026-07-24T03:33:48Z

Created page with "Justice === '''Site Navigation''' === ''Continue Reading:'' ← Intrinsic Branch: International Affairs | Intrinsic Branch: Justice | Intrinsic Branch: Progress → ← Intrinsic Branches ''Site Map:'' Category:Intrinsic Branch <categorytree mode="pages" hideroot="on" depth="5">Intrinsic Branch</categorytree>"

New page

Justice

=== '''Site Navigation''' ===
''Continue Reading:''

[[Intrinsic Branch: International Affairs|← Intrinsic Branch: International Affairs]] | [[Intrinsic Branch: Justice]] | [[Intrinsic Branch: Progress|Intrinsic Branch: Progress →]]

[[Intrinsic Branches|← Intrinsic Branches]]

''Site Map:''

[[Category:Intrinsic Branch]]
<categorytree mode="pages" hideroot="on" depth="5">Intrinsic Branch</categorytree>